Advancing Preclinical Medical Education through High Fidelity Simulation and Standardized Patient Families
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65539/pmz6e489Keywords:
medical education, simulation training, interprofessional education, communication skills, standardized patients, clinical competenceAbstract
Introduction: Simulated patient encounters in preclinical medical education are being implemented at various medical schools throughout the United States. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the perceived effectiveness of early preclinical simulations on medical students' education.
Methods: Two classes of osteopathic medical students, class of 2019 and class of 2020, participated in two simulated clinical experiences using high-fidelity patient mannequins and standardized family members during their second year of medical school. These same students, who are now completing their clinical rotations, completed a survey to assess if the experience with a simulated patient/family
Results: A total of 379 students were emailed a survey. Out of 379 total students, 122 surveys were completed (59 from the Class of 2019, 63 from the Class of 2020). The overall response rate was 32%. A majority of the respondents responded positively, with 63% of students stating in their free responses that the simulated patient encounters were experiences that improved their ability to interact professionally and appropriately with patients and family members. P-values between the classes for each survey question was greater than 0.05, indicating that there were no statistically significant differences between the classes of 2019 and 2020 in their survey responses.
Conclusion: This study provides evidence that early simulated patient encounters provide a self-reported experience that improves empathy and communication for the students during their clinical rotations.
Downloads
References
Underman K. Playing doctor: Simulation in medical school as affective practice. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 136-137:180-188.
Scoring Principles. https://www.nbome.org/exams-assessments/comlex-usa/comlex-usa-level-2-pe/scores-transcripts/scoring-principles/.
Baker HH, Cope MK, Adelman MD, Schuler S, Foster RW, Gimpel JR. Relationships between scores on the COMLEX-USA Level 2-Performance Evaluation and selected school-based performance measures. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006; 106(5):290-295.
Cope MK, Baker HH, Foster RW, Boisvert CS. Relationships between clinical rotation subscores, COMLEX-USA examination results, and school-based performance measures. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007; 107(11):502-510.
Duffy FD, Gordon GH, Whelan G, et al. Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: the Kalamazoo II report. Acad Med. 2004; 79(6):495-507.
Williams-Reade J, Lobo E, Whittemore AA, Parra L, Baerg J. Enhancing residents' compassionate communication to family members: A family systems breaking bad news simulation. Fam Syst Health. 2018; 36(4):523-527.
Carpenter AM, Hirthler MA, King CJ. Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Use of Simulated Clinical Experiences in Medical Education. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2018;118(4):235-242.
Williams-Reade J, Lobo E, Whittemore AA, Parra L, Baerg J. Enhancing residents' compassionate communication to family members: A family systems breaking bad news simulation. Fam Syst Health. 2018; 36(4):523-527.
Karkowsky CE, Chazotte C. Simulation: improving communication with patients. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37(3):157-160.
Rosenzweig MQ. Breaking bad news: a guide for effective and empathetic communication. Nurse Pract. 2012; 37(2):1-4.
Bussard ME. Self-Reflection of Video-Recorded High-Fidelity Simulations and Development of Clinical Judgment. J Nurs Educ. 2016; 55(9):522-527.
Schmitt M, Blue A, Aschenbrener CA, Viggiano TR. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: reforming health care by transforming health professionals' education. Acad Med. 2011; 86(11):1351.
Zachariae R, Pedersen CG, Jensen AB, Ehrnrooth E, Rossen PB, von der Maase H. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer. 2003; 88(5):658-665.
Kurt, S. (2018, September 06). Kirkpatrick Model: Four Levels of Learning Evaluation. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://educationaltechnology.net/kirkpatrick-model-four-levels-learning-evaluation/
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Benjamin W. Cooper, Nicholas A. Jaeger, Maureen A. Hirthler, Cathy J. King (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.