Investigating the Need for Prehospital Education to Include Sex Differences in the Clinical Presentation of Stroke
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65539/hm2hb309Keywords:
stroke, sex differences, stroke clinical presentation, prehospital educationAbstract
Since Congress passed the National Institute of Health Revitalization Act of 1993, a document that mandates the inclusion of women and minority groups into medical research, sex differences in the clinical presentations of diseases and responses to medication have emerged.1 It has been found that women and men can present differently when experiencing a stroke, with women more often experiencing ‘atypical’ or ‘nontraditional’ signs and symptoms.2-8 Prehospital curriculum standards have not yet included this information for emergency medical technicians (EMTs) or paramedics. Further, prehospital provider education standards do not require competency in sex differences in epidemiology, physiology, pathophysiology, or pharmacology.9,10 Patients of EMS providers would likely benefit if their providers were aware of these sex differences, as previous research has found that women experiencing a stroke receive a lower quality of EMS care compared to men.11 Early identification of stroke and timely notification to the nearest appropriate hospital can impact treatment decisions, and time to treatment can heavily influence functional outcomes.12 Since there is robust evidence that the clinical presentation, quality of care, and health outcomes of stroke differ between men and women, EMS education should include and emphasize these topics.
Downloads
References
1. Geller SE, Koch AR, Roesch P, Filut A, Hallgren E, Carnes M. The more things change, the more they stay the same: a study to evaluate compliance with inclusion and assessment of women and minorities in randomized controlled trials. Acad Med 2018;93:630-635. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002027
2. Lichtman JH, Leiueit EC, Safdar B, et al. Sex differences in the presentation and perception of symptoms among young patients with myocardial infarction: evidence from the VIRGO Study (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients). Circulation 2018;137:781-790. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031650
3. Cardeillac M, Lefebvre F, Baicry F, et al. Symptoms of infarction in women: is there a real difference compared to men? A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2022;11:5. doi:10.3390/jcm11051319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051319
4. Ali M, van Os HJA, van der Weerd N, et al. Sex differences in presentation of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2022;53:345-354. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.034040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.034040
5. Washington DL, Bird CE. Sex differences in disease presentation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2002;40:461-463. doi:10.1067/mem.2002.128859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.128859
6. Shajahan S, Sun L, Harris K, et al. Sex differences in the symptom presentation of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke 2023;18:144-153. doi:10.1177/17474930221090133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930221090133
7. Jerath NU, Reddy C, Freeman WD, Jerath AU, Brown RD. Gender differences in presenting signs and symptoms of acute ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Gend Med 2011;8:312-319. doi:10.1016/j.genm.2011.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genm.2011.08.001
8. Forster A, Gass A, Kern R, et al. Gender differences in acute ischemic stroke: etiology, stroke patterns and response to thrombolysis. Stroke 2009;40:2428-2432. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.548750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.548750
9. The National Emergency Medical Services Education Standards. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2021.
10. EMS Agenda 2050: A People-Centered Vision for the Future of Emergency Medical Services. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2019.
11. Dylla L, Rice JD, Poisson SN, et al. Analysis of stroke care among 2019-2020 National Emergency Medical Services Information System encounters. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2022;31:106278. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106278
12. Mulder M, Jansen IGH, Goldhoorn RB, et al. Time to endovascular treatment and outcome in acute ischemic stroke: MR CLEAN Registry results. Circulation 2018;138:232-240. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032600
13. Demel SL, Kittner S, Ley SH, McDermott M, Rexrode KM. Stroke risk factors unique to women. Stroke 2018;49:518-523. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018415
14. Aakre CA, McLeod CJ, Cha SS, Tsang TS, Lip GY, Gersh BJ. Comparison of clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. Stroke 2014;45:426-431. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002585
15. Dagres N, Nieuwlaat R, Vardas PE, et al. Gender-related differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:572-577. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.047
16. Ospel JM, Schaafsma JD, Leslie-Mazwi TM, et al. Toward a better understanding of sex-and gender-related differences in endovascular stroke treatment: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2022;53. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000411
17. De Luca A, Mariani M, Riccardi MT, Damiani G. The role of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale in the emergency department: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Access Emerg Med 2019;11:147-159. doi:10.2147/OAEM.S178544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S178544
18. Lima FO, Silva GS, Furie KL, et al. Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination: a simple and accurate prehospital scale to detect large-vessel occlusion strokes. Stroke 2016;47:1997-2002. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013301
19. Mazighi M, Chaudhry SA, Ribo M, et al. Impact of onset-to-reperfusion time on stroke mortality: a collaborative pooled analysis. Circulation 2013;127:1980-1985. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000311
20. Walter S, Phillips D, Wells B, et al. Detection to hospital door: gender differences of patients with acute stroke symptoms. Front Neurol 2022;13:833933. doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.833933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.833933
21. Govindarajan P, Friedman BT, Delgadillo JQ, et al. Race and sex disparities in prehospital recognition of acute stroke. Acad Emerg Med 2015;22:264-272. doi:10.1111/acem.12595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12595
22. Oostema JA, Konen J, Chassee T, Nasiri M, Reeves MJ. Clinical predictors of accurate prehospital stroke recognition. Stroke 2015;46:1513-1517. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008650
23. English SW, Rabinstein AA, Mandrekar J, Klaas JP. Rethinking prehospital stroke notification: assessing utility of emergency medical services impression and Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018;27:919-925. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.036
24. Oostema JA, Chassee T, Baer W, Edberg A, Reeves MJ. Brief educational intervention improves emergency medical services stroke recognition. Stroke 2019;50:1193-1200. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023885
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anna Slebonick, Kristen Ryczak, MD (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
