All that Glitters: A Perspective on Peer Reviewed Publications

Authors

  • Danielle Jameison University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Author
  • Sheila Lee UNC Hospitals, Department of Radiology, Chapel Hill, NC, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65539/4yj42w18

Keywords:

peer review, academic medicine, scholarly publication, medical education, productivity

Abstract

As trainees and even as established clinicians, we are often gifted the following wisdom: pursue your passions, but make sure your passions are productive. The hidden meaning embedded in this term "productive" is that these passions should culminate in not just any form of scholarly material, but a peer reviewed paper. In an exploration of the origins and present state of peer review and its role for both the individual clinician and academic medicine at large, what follows is a discussion of the peer-reviewed publication as the "gold standard" of productivity, and what alternatives might be considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G. and Cronin, B. Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013;64: 2-17. doi:10.1002/asi.22784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22784

Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Boswell M, Hirsch JA. Medical Journal Peer Review: Process and Bias. Pain Physician. 2015;18:E1-E14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj/2015.18.E1

Kronick DA. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1990;263(10):1321-1322. doi:10.1001/jama.263.10.1321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440100021002

About Us. The Lancet. https://www.thelancet.com/about-us. Accessed June 5, 2018.

For Authors. JAMA. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/pages/for-authors#fa-about. Accessed June 6, 2018.

Atasoylu AA, Wright SM, Beasley BW, et al. Promotion Criteria for Clinician-educators. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2003;18(9):711-716. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10425.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10425.x

Smith CC, Mccormick I, Huang GC. The Clinician–Educator Track. Academic Medicine. 2014;89(6):888-891. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000242

Downloads

Published

2020-02-28

How to Cite

All that Glitters: A Perspective on Peer Reviewed Publications. (2020). Harvard Medical Student Review, 5(1), 4-6. https://doi.org/10.65539/4yj42w18

Similar Articles

1-10 of 58

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.